Comprehensive Zoning Reform and Housing Production (Bill 2025-1545)

Spoke on behalf of Pro Housing Pittsburgh in strong support of Bill 2025-1545, emphasizing that the zoning reform will remove barriers to housing development, eliminate outdated parking minimums, and allow gentle density through ADUs.

Expressed support for the zoning reform bill and thanked council members for their work on the legislation over the past few years.

Testified in favor of the bill as a homeowner from Beachview, noting that parking minimums increase building costs and that ADUs help seniors on fixed incomes.

An architect from Lawrenceville expressed concern over proposed height increases in neighborhood commercial districts (up to 105 feet) and the removal of residential compatibility standards, warning it could threaten neighborhood character.

Supported the bill from Polish Hill but urged council to strengthen it by reinstating a 35-year affordability period and allocating payment-in-lieu funds to a social housing fund.

Expressed support for parking reform and cautious support for ADUs, but noted disappointment with the 20-year affordability cap compared to the 35-year period in existing inclusionary zoning overlays.

Spoke on behalf of older adult advocacy groups in favor of ADU provisions, noting they help seniors on fixed incomes and provide crucial housing options.

Representing Lawrenceville Together, supported parking reform and ADUs while advocating for a 35-year affordability period, higher payment-in-lieu fees, and lower height limits in neighborhood commercial districts.

Spoke as co-chair of the Pittsburgh Housing Justice Table, welcoming improvements to the voluntary bonus program but urging a 35-year affordability period and dedication of payment-in-lieu funds to social housing.

Expressed general support from Polish Hill for affordable housing efforts but raised concerns regarding short-term rentals, height allowances blocking views, and neighborhood-specific parking impacts.

Testified on behalf of Pittsburghers for Public Transit in strong support of parking minimum elimination, TDM, and ADUs, while urging a 35-year affordability period.

Expressed strong concerns from Fine View regarding blanket zoning that ignores topography, potential parking shortages from ADUs, and height increases damaging neighborhood character and views.

Speaking for AARP Pennsylvania, supported housing choice and age-friendly housing provisions while encouraging continued monitoring of affordability programs for older adults.

Raised concerns about short-term rentals, parking availability for seniors on the North Side, and the potential negative impact of multi-story buildings on community stability.

Representing Bloomfield Garfield Corporation, spoke favorably of ADU and parking reforms but questioned whether the affordable housing bonus program would bridge financial gaps for private developers.