O
Pittsburgh
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Hazelwood Riverfront Rezoning (Bill 2025-1993)

Pittsburgh

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (8)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 6, 2026.

Public comments (11)

OpposedBrendan O'DonnellMar 6, 2026

Representing Allegheny Valley Railroad, urged council to vote no, citing active rail operations, federal preemption, and an unnecessary rezoning of a thriving industrial area.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 13:19 →
SupportiveJody ChowderMar 6, 2026

Shared perspective from Highland Park regarding riverfront zoning processes and praised the railroad as a responsive and good neighbor during local construction.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 16:30 →
OpposedBill SiddickMar 6, 2026

Representing CSX, stated that the rail yard property should not be rezoned, highlighted federal preemption, and noted a lack of initial consultation with major property stakeholders.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 18:47 →
OpposedMichael FiloniMar 6, 2026

Chief Marketing Officer for Allegheny Valley Railroad highlighted the 150-year history of rail in Hazelwood, increased rail traffic, and substantial infrastructure investments.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 22:15 →
OpposedJohn AshbridgeMar 6, 2026

President of Allegheny Valley Railroad stated the yard is a modern, efficient facility removing thousands of trucks from roads and urged council to vote no.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 25:37 →
OpposedBrett SebastianMar 6, 2026

Representing Go Rail, spoke on the national economic importance of freight rail and the difficulty of restoring rail connections once lost.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 28:44 →
OpposedMichael TetlerMar 6, 2026

Executive VP of Parload Express spoke against the rezoning, arguing it is inconsistent with surrounding industrial uses and fails to resolve neighborhood concerns constructively.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 32:08 →
SupportiveDavid Clay SpanglerMar 6, 2026

General manager for steel galvanizing operations highlighted high-paying local jobs and reliance on railroad services to keep trucks off local streets.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 34:20 →
OpposedChristopher VoltsMar 6, 2026

Representing Republic Services, warned that the bill would turn recycling and industrial operations into non-conforming uses, limiting future expansion and improvements.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 38:04 →
SupportiveSonya TillmanMar 6, 2026

Executive Director of Hazelwood Initiative supported the rezoning as an environmental justice measure to protect residents from heavy industrial impacts while fostering constructive dialogue.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 40:30 →
OpposedLori KolchinskiMar 6, 2026

General Manager of BFI Waste Services (Republic Services) asked council to vote down the bill or carve out recycling processing to protect city recycling operations and facility upgrades.

Committee on Hearings and Policy — March 6, 2026 · 42:32 →