O
Pittsburgh
← Community
Parks RecCommunity discussion

Proposed DPW Maintenance Hub in Schenley Park

Pittsburgh

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 2, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedCassie FichterSep 2, 2026

Expressed strong opposition to building a DPW maintenance hub on Prospect Drive in Schenley Park, citing code chapter 480a violations and tree loss.

Standing Committees — September 2, 2026 · 1:59 →
OpposedDr. Janet D. MarlanSep 2, 2026

Expressed concern over commercial vehicles, noise, and property value impacts near her Hobart Street home adjacent to the proposed Schenley Park hub.

Standing Committees — September 2, 2026 · 5:00 →
OpposedChris ZurawskySep 2, 2026

Challenged the administration's claim that city parks traditionally have DPW yards inside them, noting that other parks face similar conflicts.

Standing Committees — September 2, 2026 · 7:10 →
OpposedWilliam A. SilvikaSep 2, 2026

Urged council to protect Schenley Park's green space and evaluate non-park alternatives for the DPW facility.

Standing Committees — September 2, 2026 · 12:30 →
OpposedLewis SeilerSep 2, 2026

Argued that building the facility on Prospect Drive violates greenway preservation laws and ignores landslide risks.

Standing Committees — September 2, 2026 · 14:37 →
ConcernedAnnie QuinnSep 2, 2026

Thanked DPW for flood protection work in Greenfield but urged the city to recognize the economic and environmental value of park green space.

Standing Committees — September 2, 2026 · 24:09 →